|
HOW TO WRITE
ABOUT WRITING Essays on
Performance Writing, Poetics and Poetry, vols 1 & 2,
John Hall (250pp and
276pp, Shearsman) |
|
John Hall's
preface to the first of these two important volumes tells us that one of the
earliest pieces collected - a piece on the poetry of Peter Riley - uses 'the
epistolary modality of I-you, where responsibility to the addressee is
self-evident' as posed to 'the third-party triangulation of a critical essay,
where lines of answerability are much less clear-cut.' He goes on to note
that the essay is a matter of trying something out as opposed to
disseminating knowledge from a position of authority. And this has definite
and definitive implications for the poet, writer or performer: 'what is it
that writers and performers know? (And what do their writings and
performances know [É]) What should they know? What is the source of any
authority they do have?'' Anyone working
in HE and the world of anonymously peer-reviewed journals ought to have
thought about these questions. My article on, say, Seamus Heaney is given the
authority of publication because I have revised it in response to anonymous
readers' reports. It has therefore been admitted to an agreed body of
knowledge called 'Seamus Heaney'. Other people can read it with confidence
that this process has taken place. But, of course, this authority has nothing
to do with the authority of Heaney's lyric voice which existed before I wrote
about it and will exist long after the journal I published in a forgotten
about and/or pulped. These questions
also go to the heart of Hall's major concern in these two volumes: the status
of writing and the future and nature of performance writing. For Hall,
performance writing is 'as much to do with what writing performs within a
society as with what forms it takes' and is 'a name for a set of dispatches
towards textual practice and enquiry' and 'their embeddedness is political
economy.' Volume One
collects essays and notes that address performance writring directly and will
be of great pedagogical interest, both historically and for anyone wishing to
continue working in this area. Voume Two opens out to consider poets and
their writing: Harry Guest, Kelvin Corcoran, Allen Fisher, Lee Harwood, Peter
Hughes, John James, Nicholas Johnson, Karen Mac Cormack, Geraldine Monk,
Alice Notley, Douglas Oliver, F.T.Prince, J.H.Prynne, John Riley ad Peter
Riley. What is striking about these essays is the care evident in the writing
and the corresponding eschewal of authority. Many of these essays are beginnings,
approaches, journeys around, ways into. As Hall notes in his short essay on
F.T.Prince, 'the terms of engagement for this particular poem have been
declared.' It is such terms that are Hall's concern throughout Volume Two and
if that means that a 'reading' doesn't get much further then recognising the
nature of such a declaration then to be it. The recognition
if terms of engagement means that essay after essay is full of surprising
insights not least because of Hall's deliberate self-conscious about whether
or not to disentangle key features of a writer's work from its overall
readerly impression. So there is much to learn here about how to read and
about how to write about poetry, particularly that in the broadly late
modernist tradition. These are beautiful and important volumes and I shall be
returning to them often. © David Kennedy 2014 |