|
|
Ruminations
& Odd Corners |
|
|
Reading
through these books, I started to think, so he's been there, she's done that,
he's had that thought, she's remembered this, he's felt that, these responses
of mine without much interest in the fact that what was there was a poem, nor
indeed in what was being told. I have long known this isn't true of Miriam
Obrey's poems (in the Oxford book); I happen to have had my own gaze for a
while in the Forest of Dean and even more deeply along the mid-Wales coast
(Richard Turley's places), but I wasn't taken back there by his poems. |
|
|
Susan
Howe most of all (for me) exemplifies what being a quite other kind of poet
means. Continuing on from previous ways and means, she is in the library, in
the archives, she picks up fragments, is deep in the details of particular
history. In one sense she is self-effacing - the book isn't about her - while
in another sense she is utterly relishing doing her own thing. She is not
concerned with self-expression, nor with how poems have been till now 'so
let's do more of that'. Here is a book of documentation: prose telling,
information, short squared texts (texts seems the right word, setting
them aside, giving them space), and one page has all to itself a line new to
me from Wallace Stevens, 'The wind had seized the tree and ha, and ha,' that
could eclipse even her whole book, so wonderful is it. I shall go in search
of more lines like that and ruminations and odd corners like hers. |