|
|
Here She Comes Again Ariel : The Restored Edition, Sylvia Plath (201 pp, Faber, £16.99) |
|
|
This venture has been welcomed as an exercise in setting
Plath's version of Ariel in place of
that originally edited by Ted Hughes after her death in 1963. The difference
is that Hughes incorporated ten later poems and excised some pieces
originally listed by Plath in the MS. This new edition, somewhat like an
expanded CD or a 'Director's Cut' DVD, returns as closely as possible to
Plath's running order, but readers of the 1981 Collected Poems will find little new here to interest them apart
from thirteen pages displaying the drafting process of the title poem. This
edition is, however, sanctioned by Plath's daughter, Frieda Hughes, who
contributes an interesting and personal foreword. Frieda herself seems weary of the Plath/Hughes industry
and it remains to be seen whether this strategy will clear those muddied
waters. What the legions of Plath/Hughes scholars (and filmmakers) have
done has undoubtedly stoked up competing fires, but by the light of these it
becomes increasingly difficult to focus just on the poetry. Reading Ariel throughout is an exercise in suffocating intensity: was she always
like this? Elm tree roots ('I have been there'), tulips ('through the gift
paper I could hear them breathe'), a fever ('I / am a pure acetylene /
virgin')... on it goes, tacked to a deadening solipsism and a circulating
sequence of private symbols. Is it any surprise that Platholatory is an adolescent
symptom? Reading these poems in any kind of ordinary (ie : non-heightened)
situation harshly reveals an exhaustion and a clamour pervading even the
punctuation and syntax. Beside Plath, Hughes seems rooted and solid; beside Ariel, Robert Lowell's Life Studies seems remarkably suffused with a sense of an
exterior world. Even in Plath's famous sequence of bee poems ('The Bee
Meeting', 'The Arrival of the Bee Box', 'Stings', 'Wintering' and the
non-canonic 'The Swarm', all here), the apiarists are bit-part players whilst
Plath is 'the magician's girl who does not flinch'. In some of the more restrained pieces here, 'You're' for
instance, there is a sense of balance and poise, and 'Daddy' and 'Lady
Lazarus' remain truly terrifying, but such fervid apprehension of the self all the time? I direct the reader instead to Johnny
Panic and the Bible of Dreams (Faber,
1977), the wonderful collection of Plath's short stories, where the
bee-keepers reappear in some journal extracts, but this time as real human
beings. © M.C. Caseley 2005 |